Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2009 21:40:10 GMT -5
okay my bad...i shoulda read that a lil better
|
|
|
|
Post by Doc Henry on Sept 27, 2009 22:44:55 GMT -5
So what Slickie gers a w, logan a l, and everyonelse a n/d?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2009 22:46:25 GMT -5
no i think its just Slickie T gets a W, everyone else doesnt change at all....and Slickie moves up a lil in the rankings
|
|
|
|
Post by Doc Henry on Sept 27, 2009 22:47:40 GMT -5
well technically there would be n/d's
|
|
|
|
Post by Allen Guiliano on Sept 27, 2009 22:50:27 GMT -5
The way I read it....No one gets wins or losses, I simply move up from #3 to #2 in the rankings.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2009 22:52:03 GMT -5
i'm just glad i dont technically get the loss...would screw up my rp's where i brag about being undefeated and that would make me have to do some other heelish things and ugggh too much to think about at midnight
|
|
|
|
Post by Doc Henry on Sept 27, 2009 23:00:12 GMT -5
wuss.... ;p
|
|
|
|
Post by bigtimejerks on Sept 28, 2009 3:31:41 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2009 18:35:29 GMT -5
War Update| Rank | Name | W | L | D/NC | Win % | Last | | 1 | Torture | 17 | 10 | 2 | 58.62 | 1 | | 2 | A. Guiliano | 9 | 6 | 0 | 60 | 3 | | 3 | J. Reb | 15 | 6 | 2 | 65.22 | 2 | | 4 | M. Mikami | 10 | 11 | 0 | 47.62 | 4 | | 5 | H. Rodriguez | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.33 | 5 | | 6 | Logan | 18 | 14 | 1 | 54.55 | 6 | | 7 | D. Ken | 12 | 5 | 1 | 66.67 | 7 | | 8 | Havoc | 4 | 3 | 1 | 50 | 8 | | 9 | J. Price | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 9 | | 10 | Superfans | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 10 | | 11 | A. Petrova | 7 | 4 | 0 | 63.64 | 11 | | 12 | D. Henry | 5 | 5 | 0 | 50 | 12 | | 13 | D-Day | 6 | 7 | 1 | 42.86 | 13 | | 14 | J. Anthrax | 5 | 11 | 0 | 31.25 | 14 | | 15 | C. Avery | 9 | 18 | 1 | 32.14 | 15 | | 16 | Greenfever | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75 | 16 | | 17 | T. Reaper | 12 | 11 | 0 | 52.17 | 17 | | 18 | R. Daniels | 6 | 22 | 3 | 19.35 | 18 | | 19 | R. Mad | 4 | 7 | 0 | 36.36 | 19 | | 20 | Big Time Jerks | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25 | 20 | | 21 | C. Death | 12 | 13 | 2 | 44.44 | 21 | | 22 | J. Dean | 1 | 10 | 0 | 9.09 | 22 | | 23 | Death | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 23 | | 24 | C. Jacobs | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.67 | 24 | | 25 | T. Derden | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 25 | | 26 | A. Slaughter | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 26t | | 27 | J. Hott | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 26t |
Notes: Tag team matches and such count for win/loss, however only the people involved in the pinfall/submission will change ranks. D/NC = Draw/No Contest. Last = last week's rank
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2009 18:47:43 GMT -5
so let me see if i have this down right....if i'm successful against Hector Rodriguez defending my TV Title on Slam, i'll move up in the rankings because i will have beaten someone higher ranked than me......correct?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2009 18:57:38 GMT -5
so let me see if i have this down right....if i'm successful against Hector Rodriguez defending my TV Title on Slam, i'll move up in the rankings because i will have beaten someone higher ranked than me......correct? Ed McMahon: "You are correct, sir!" |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2009 19:08:29 GMT -5
In the words of the very wise, and very tubby Peter Griffin
"Freakin' Sweet"
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2009 20:50:49 GMT -5
...and then the TV Champion will be ranked higher than the US Champion. Maybe I should rethink this.
|
|
|
|
Post by Allen Guiliano on Sept 30, 2009 20:54:52 GMT -5
Nothing wrong with that...You cant control storylines and title holders...Thats just how it plays out sometimes.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2009 20:56:36 GMT -5
Yeah, all the same I might try to come up with a different system next week and see what it looks like then. I don't want to be the BCS.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2009 21:25:40 GMT -5
I don't neccessarily have to end up higher than the US Champion Logan.....moving up in the rankings could mean i end up at like 7 or 8
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2009 21:33:14 GMT -5
As a former titleholder I can confirm that the TV title is superior to the US title. The TV champion represents the entire television broadcast spectrum while the US titleholder represents only the continental US and its crumbling infrastructure. Clearly this is no match for the power of television.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2009 21:42:56 GMT -5
Trust me when I say this, I have no issue with what Mikami said about the TV Chamion being ranked about the US Champion and how that doesn't sound right. Unless Logan were to lose a singles match or two and his title wasn't on the line, I shouldn't move ahead of him. Which is why I said that if I were to move up, i'd have no complaints about going to the 7 or 8 spot. Of course Logan could also move up ahead to Rodriguez's spot and I could go to the 6 spot...another possible scenario.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jack of Blades on Sept 30, 2009 21:49:36 GMT -5
Or maybe we could all treat Mikami's ladder as a peripheral device rather than a ranking integral to the direction of WCF.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2009 21:59:21 GMT -5
Or maybe we could all treat Mikami's ladder as a peripheral device rather than a ranking integral to the direction of WCF. Ahhh... JoB, the voice of reason. I never know WTF he's talking about, but then I don't speak the Queen's English. |
|
