|
|
Post by Seth on Jul 6, 2016 2:48:52 GMT -5
I love the idea of "live" shows. I don't want to do another War style show at the moment.
Last year, Showdown was semi-live - I updated a thread as I finished results. It didn't really go by any rhyme or reason, it was as matches were submitted and as I got them written.
Thoughts on this format? Would you be interested in seeing it again?
|
|
|
|
Post by Odin Balfore on Jul 6, 2016 2:49:48 GMT -5
the showdown match should go up in stages.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2016 3:18:04 GMT -5
I'd say yes, but I think the pacing and frequency of the updates should increase. Live updates are super hype, but I thought they definitely could've been a bit more at a time or a bit less of a cocktease in a way. I remember it was like 2 in the morning with the Showdown match kind of dragging due to it being line for line at times. It can be good, but I think the suspense and cocktease was tad much. Yes to the semi-live results, but with a better pace to what is posted with each update.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stuart Slane on Jul 6, 2016 6:53:08 GMT -5
Do you know yet if Ultimate Showdown will be a straight title shuffle, or will the early eliminations walk away without a belt at all? If memory serves WCF has done both formats.
|
|
|
|
Post by Seth on Jul 6, 2016 9:56:54 GMT -5
Do you know yet if Ultimate Showdown will be a straight title shuffle, or will the early eliminations walk away without a belt at all? If memory serves WCF has done both formats. Title shuffle; with the Tag Champs added in that is eight men and I'm leaving it there! |
|
