|
|
Post by Thomas Uriel Bates on Jun 2, 2016 20:58:54 GMT -5
Alright folks, I have created a new character (non-wrestler) that is meant for everyone in the WCF. I will be portraying the character, but will be willing to take on any clients that needs representation... Pretty much, we need to be honest here; there's a lot of things in WCF that quite frankly would have resulted in the arrest of many superstars and the shutdown of the fed. This character will be an attempt to explain away how we got to stick around. If you're interested in using him in a roleplay or storyline, let me know. I'm happy to work with anyone. I'm also happy to listen to whatever anyone else has to say on legal matters, as I have yet to attend Law School, yet. (It's in the works). Thaddeus Jefferson Montgomery III, Attorney at Law |
|
|
|
Post by Henry Spearman on Jun 2, 2016 21:20:25 GMT -5
Great idea. Admittedly I scratched my head when Night Rider killed a guy hahaha |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2016 22:53:28 GMT -5
Should I make a character who's considered the greatest cleaner in the world? Yet another reason why WCF superstars who murder people never get caught.
I may even make him multiracial just to piss off Dag IC...
|
|
|
|
Post by Thaddeus J. Montgomery III on Jun 3, 2016 0:32:46 GMT -5
Should I make a character who's considered the greatest cleaner in the world? Yet another reason why WCF superstars who murder people never get caught. I may even make him multiracial just to piss off Dag IC... I see a large storyline in which Mr. Montgomery and your cleaner work hard to keep the WCF afloat, and make sure that the superstars are kept out of prison. Your cleaner may want to hire a rather large crew though. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2016 8:51:10 GMT -5
Great idea. Admittedly I scratched my head when Night Rider killed a guy hahaha Eh. I killed three in one roleplay. Just dump the bodies in the space between 1151 and the retaining wall. No one would check an abandoned train   |
|
|
|
Post by Henry Spearman on Jun 3, 2016 8:58:11 GMT -5
I've wondered though, are the murders in roleplays fair to be used in a roleplay against you?
I didn't use it against nightrider because I'm not sure how that works. I view all roleplays as something that airs on tv so I don't wanna use something that technically isn't shown on TV.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stuart Slane on Jun 3, 2016 9:01:25 GMT -5
I've wondered though, are the murders in roleplays fair to be used in a roleplay against you? I didn't use it against nightrider because I'm not sure how that works. I view all roleplays as something that airs on tv so I don't wanna use something that technically isn't shown on TV. In the past anything in a person's role play is fair game to be commented on by others. Doesn't matter if it's on camera, off camera, or going on inside the person's head. |
|
|
|
Post by Henry Spearman on Jun 3, 2016 9:02:54 GMT -5
I've wondered though, are the murders in roleplays fair to be used in a roleplay against you? I didn't use it against nightrider because I'm not sure how that works. I view all roleplays as something that airs on tv so I don't wanna use something that technically isn't shown on TV. In the past anything in a person's role play is fair game to be commented on by others. Doesn't matter if it's on camera, off camera, or going on inside the person's head. That's how it was in other feds I've been in but we never had actual murders hahaha |
|
|
|
Post by Thomas Uriel Bates on Jun 3, 2016 9:17:59 GMT -5
I try to "use" only what was in "recorded" parts of a roleplay. This is not always possible, especially here.
My answer was drones. WCF deploys drones to record everything WCF stars do.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stuart Slane on Jun 3, 2016 9:31:20 GMT -5
If I feel my character(s) need a rationale for knowing something they shouldn't I just say they "read it in the dirtsheets".
|
|
|
|
Post by Henry Spearman on Jun 3, 2016 9:54:26 GMT -5
Right like in this case I felt like the murder was obviously supposed to be secret but at the same time that was a HUGE part of the roleplay.
I used it as if it might possibly be night rider having some kind of mental breakdown but I don't really know
|
|
Lilith
Newbie
Cancer
Lol
Posts: 60 
|
Post by Lilith on Jun 3, 2016 10:20:08 GMT -5
I've wondered though, are the murders in roleplays fair to be used in a roleplay against you? I didn't use it against nightrider because I'm not sure how that works. I view all roleplays as something that airs on tv so I don't wanna use something that technically isn't shown on TV. In the past anything in a person's role play is fair game to be commented on by others. Doesn't matter if it's on camera, off camera, or going on inside the person's head. Reference things the character has done in the past in their rps... but never ever ever reference or respond to things they do in the week they're facing you. Responding to your opponents rps is NEVER a good idea. |
|
|
|
Post by Thomas Uriel Bates on Jun 3, 2016 10:33:16 GMT -5
In the past anything in a person's role play is fair game to be commented on by others. Doesn't matter if it's on camera, off camera, or going on inside the person's head. Reference things the character has done in the past in their rps... but never ever ever reference or respond to things they do in the week they're facing you. Responding to your opponents rps is NEVER a good idea. I'm an old school efedder, that's the way all roleplays used to be. Your opponent roleplayed, you roleplayed and countered, he roleplayed to counter, etc. WCF seems to be quite the different animal. |
|
Lilith
Newbie
Cancer
Lol
Posts: 60
|
Post by Lilith on Jun 3, 2016 10:37:17 GMT -5
Reference things the character has done in the past in their rps... but never ever ever reference or respond to things they do in the week they're facing you. Responding to your opponents rps is NEVER a good idea. I'm an old school efedder, that's the way all roleplays used to be. Your opponent roleplayed, you roleplayed and countered, he roleplayed to counter, etc. WCF seems to be quite the different animal. I think its somewhat alright to do if you're in a Hardcore Match and you're dropping lots and lots of rps. But if you're just writing one rp for the week and all you do is respond to what your opponent has done or said, it makes you look incredibly weak imo |
|
|
|
Post by Henry Spearman on Jun 3, 2016 10:59:54 GMT -5
I agree with lilith if there sonly a one roleplay limit. Im old school in that we never had roleplay limits so things went back and forth for days. In that cse i liked countering. Here,however with the one rp limiti agree it makes you look week.
Honestly, i find it to be a breathe of fresh air. I dont worry about what my opponent says or does. I just tell my own story and hope its better than the story he told
|
|
|
|
Post by Stuart Slane on Jun 3, 2016 11:15:13 GMT -5
In the past anything in a person's role play is fair game to be commented on by others. Doesn't matter if it's on camera, off camera, or going on inside the person's head. Reference things the character has done in the past in their rps... but never ever ever reference or respond to things they do in the week they're facing you. Responding to your opponents rps is NEVER a good idea. Responding to an opponent's role play isn't against the rules, just generally frowned upon, and the practice isn't supposed to give the writer any advantage when it comes to judging. |
|
