Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2010 18:28:46 GMT -5
Updated Rankings As Of: Slam 11/8/10 | Rank | Name | Wins | Losses | DQ/NC | Win % | Last Rank | | 1 | Logan | 25 | 22 | 1 | 52.08 | 1 | | 2 | Oblivion | 21 | 15 | 4 | 52.5 | 2 | | 3 | C. Avery | 11 | 25 | 3 | 28.20 | 4 | | 4 | D-Day | 26 | 29 | 1 | 46.42 | 5 | | 5 | C. Death | 26 | 29 | 4 | 44.06 | 6 | | 6 | J. Reb | 40 | 20 | 4 | 62.5 | 7 | | 7 | D. Henry | 28 | 29 | 3 | 46.6 | 8 | | 8 | P. Dangerous | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50 | 9 | | 9 | C. Punishment | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.14 | 10 | | 10 | J. Price | 22 | 8 | 5 | 62.85 | 11 | | 11 | B. Kane | 11 | 16 | 4 | 35.48 | 12 | | 12 | A. Young | 11 | 24 | 1 | 30.55 | 14 | | 13 | A. Adams | 11 | 23 | 1 | 31.42 | 15 | | 14 | The 'Scot | 3 | 10 | 0 | 23.07 | 16 | | 15 | Frost | 1 | 0 | 2 | 33.3 | 17 | | 16 | Ingvar | 1 | 0 | 2 | 33.3 | 18 | | 17 | R. Mad | 4 | 8 | 0 | 33.3 | 19 | | 18 | Torture | 32 | 25 | 3 | 64 | 20 | | 19 | S. Jackson | 2 | 4 | 1 | 28.57 | 21 | | 20 | T. Reaper | 15 | 18 | 3 | 41.6 | 22 | | 21 | T. Malenko | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.6 | 23 | | 22 | B. Young | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 24 |
Removed from the rankings - Greenfever and Russle Trombone 
|
|
|
|
Post by Torture on Nov 10, 2010 18:57:17 GMT -5
The BCS Ranking System does more for College Football, than Price/Seth do with this Ranking System. It's quite possibly the worst Rankings.. of all time. LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by Seth on Nov 10, 2010 18:59:06 GMT -5
If you beat someone in this ranking system, you get ranked hire than them. Done.
|
|
|
|
Post by Torture on Nov 10, 2010 19:00:00 GMT -5
Yeah, so if Logan loses to Tank Reaper in a non title match, and it's a fluke win, does Tank Reaper rank higher than everyone in WCF? Including Oblivion, and Price, and even guys who have defeated Reaper week in and week out?
How does that = logic?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2010 19:01:45 GMT -5
When did Malachi Wanderlust come back?  |
|
|
|
Post by Torture on Nov 10, 2010 19:04:30 GMT -5
I'm just saying, the way Mikami had it done was a bit more stricter on moving people up.. I mean Avery is fourth best in the WCF? How the fuck is Reb not in the top five? How is Jay Price so low on the list yet always main eventing? I don't get it.
Mikami would have Avery high, but not that high, and the guys who continually are at the top of the cards and fight harder opponents should be rated higher than Creeping Death who hardly ever fights, and if he does, they never have true endings? LOL.
I'm just saying, it's weird looking at the rankings and thinking.. yeah, that makes sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by Seth on Nov 10, 2010 19:05:49 GMT -5
Well traditionally the World Champ was kept at #1 no matter what, though if that changed I wouldn't really argue it too much, I can see both sides of that.
But Torture, that equals logic because Tank beat the top man in the rankings, which should mean that he's better than him, yada yada.
|
|
|
|
Post by Seth on Nov 10, 2010 19:08:07 GMT -5
But no, Torture, I'm pretty sure Mikami straight up did the "he beat him so he's ranked higher now" thing.
Reb isn't in the top five because he hasn't beaten anyone that high in the rankings lately. Price is low and main eventing because Price hasn't beaten anyone high lately, but I obviously don't book based on these rankings. CD got where he is because he beat SOMEONE high in the rankings and it had a true ending.
|
|
|
|
Post by Torture on Nov 10, 2010 19:08:47 GMT -5
Yeah, ONE time but in a rematch, Logan would definatly win, so where does Tank go? He stays #2?? No, because everyone else already beat Tank before.
Tank moves up, but he certainly doesn't move up past everyone else.
Yeah, the World Champion should be #1, that makes sense to me, but having a fluke win over a top fiver means you're the best in WCF is not logic.
|
|
|
|
Post by Torture on Nov 10, 2010 19:10:31 GMT -5
So if Torture beats Creeping Death, Torture gets 5th? Or does he get #2.. considering Torture has beaten everyone else?
|
|
|
|
Post by Seth on Nov 10, 2010 19:11:23 GMT -5
Then they'll beat Tank again and he'll move back down, fine. The ladder doesn't differentiate between real wins and "fluke" wins - because thats subjective, and its not meant to be subjective.
|
|
|
|
Post by Torture on Nov 10, 2010 19:12:07 GMT -5
Yeah, so Shelton Benjamin is ranked higher than HHH in the WWE?
|
|
|
|
Post by Seth on Nov 10, 2010 19:12:21 GMT -5
Tort, you get 5th, and if you'd want to be higher you have to beat them again seeing as once you're taken off the ladder you start back at the bottom.
|
|
|
|
Post by Seth on Nov 10, 2010 19:13:06 GMT -5
No, because Trips beat him after that a bunch of times I'm sure.
But otherwise, in the "WWE Ladder Rankings" then yes, if they chose to use this system, sure! Thats how it would be!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2010 19:14:07 GMT -5
Yeah, ONE time but in a rematch, Logan would definatly win, so where does Tank go? He stays #2?? No, because everyone else already beat Tank before. Tank moves up, but he certainly doesn't move up past everyone else. Yeah, the World Champion should be #1, that makes sense to me, but having a fluke win over a top fiver means you're the best in WCF is not logic. Not always a fluke. But anyways, if someone is in the top 5 that is only there for that reasoning, chances are they'll get knocked back out. Of course I could always do it the way WWE does their Power Rankings. World Champion at 3 and SuperTort at 1. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Torture on Nov 10, 2010 19:14:22 GMT -5
You've yet to make any sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by Seth on Nov 10, 2010 19:16:10 GMT -5
"IF YOU BEAT SOMEONE YOU ARE BETTER THAN THEM"
Logic!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2010 19:16:35 GMT -5
And you've yet to have anyone back you up. As it stands, you're the only one that doesn't like how things are done.
|
|
|
|
Post by Torture on Nov 10, 2010 19:17:17 GMT -5
Well, we could do it that way, but WWE is crazy. UFC Rankings is what Mikami closely reminded me of at hte start of this.. Mikami moved a guy up or two because they had Titles and Titles do mean something but for the most part it was kept strict and tight on who moved up and down.
So if Mark Henry beats Shelton Benjamin, is Henry ranked higher than HHH too? What about Carlito? All of them are ranked higher than a 17 time World Champion. (If he's won it more, let me know..)
|
|
|
|
Post by Torture on Nov 10, 2010 19:17:55 GMT -5
I didn't say I don't like it done but to say Avery is the 4th best wrestler in WCF that's just crazy.. considering he's RPed twice and beat Day, and uh.. lost at Helloween, and then beat Bo Young.
|
|
