|
|
Post by Dean Wolf on Jun 26, 2016 18:57:25 GMT -5
A report I saw on SE Scoops says we may be seeing pay-per-views or big events (like Takeover) from WWE on average of every two weeks in the future.
What is this company thinking?
|
|
|
|
Post by Corey Black on Jun 26, 2016 19:17:08 GMT -5
Raw and Smackdown..? It makes sense. Month build each.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gemini Battle on Jun 26, 2016 19:52:57 GMT -5
This is the perfect opportunity to maintain monthly shows as status quo but have longer and more in depth angles leading to them. Seems like a miss on this brand split thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Corey Black on Jun 26, 2016 20:14:27 GMT -5
Makes the split more legit. We now have two WWEs both with monthly PPVs. Nobody complained when it was WWE and WCW. That's the goal.
Anything that adds to my Network subscription is cool by me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gemini Battle on Jun 26, 2016 21:26:36 GMT -5
Makes the split more legit. We now have two WWEs both with monthly PPVs. Nobody complained when it was WWE and WCW. That's the goal. Anything that adds to my Network subscription is cool by me. Very true. I hope it works out. |
|
|
|
Post by Dean Wolf on Jun 27, 2016 9:26:02 GMT -5
i like PPVs that have longer builds, so I'm not a fan.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gemini Battle on Jun 27, 2016 13:03:48 GMT -5
i like PPVs that have longer builds, so I'm not a fan. You're not a fan of anything. |
|
|
|
Post by 'The Shine' Brent Alpine on Jun 27, 2016 13:43:25 GMT -5
It's been a long time since I've thought 'I really need to see more wrestling'. The brand split and rumoured NXT call ups should at least make shows more meaningful as Smackdown has seemed needless for years. I just hope we see less of the 50/50 booking and competitors having faced each other numerous times before a PPV blow off match that ultimately means nothing.
|
|
