|
Post by Corey Black on Apr 6, 2006 14:25:20 GMT -5
It has become apparent that you new guys have a RIDONKULOUS amount of time on your hands that you divote to RPing.
That's fine and all, but it come as a downfall to those of us with less time ... or whatever you want to call it.
It's hard to combat five RPs. I'll be lucky to produce three or sometimes even two.
So I'll suggest a limit of three RPs per character per week. Seems fair enough.
|
|
|
Post by Jack of Blades on Apr 6, 2006 14:31:57 GMT -5
Yes of course, Lord Susan.
Would you also like us to ban Motown and exterminate free thought as well?
I have already specified which promos I want to be considered for my match and which ones are just for character development.
|
|
|
Post by Torture on Apr 6, 2006 15:13:55 GMT -5
I feel you can only Roleplay at a max four times per week.
Whether it be Roleplays and Character Development. I feel you should only post four times.
Thats the whole point of Roleplaying.. You get a minimal amount of posts and you use it to your advantage to RP. Whose better than the other?
I'm not mad that you guys RP more than me.. because basically, I can RP twice and win. I'm that damn good. Just kidding. I suck.
Anyways. I'm up for a max. amount of RPs.
|
|
|
Post by wblstudios on Apr 6, 2006 15:55:25 GMT -5
I'd like to agree with the RP limit, but for a slightly different reason. Personally, I don't have the internet at home, and can only get on at a cafe that's only open 5 days a week. I have to get here, get in the mindset, and write what I can when I come here. This gives an unfair advantage to people who can get on, people without other outside influences on their lives, and get on whenever they want, for however long they want, and out-quantity someone.
EDIT: I noticed I just agreed with CD. That should show you how dire this situation is.
|
|
|
Post by Jack of Blades on Apr 6, 2006 16:49:51 GMT -5
I think that rather than having a limit as such people should just specify the purpose of the RP's i.e. Character development, response to a match, shits and giggles.
|
|
|
Post by Corey Black on Apr 6, 2006 17:23:16 GMT -5
Regardless of if you specify or not, every piece will be considered. I've found myself not caring when I go to RP and my opponent already has three RPs up. It's just a straight up mental drainer. What the fuck, Lord Susan? Dooouuuuche.
|
|
|
Post by Jack of Blades on Apr 6, 2006 17:27:06 GMT -5
Well surely it is quality over quantity.
|
|
|
Post by Corey Black on Apr 6, 2006 17:29:55 GMT -5
It's implied, but everyone knows if I do two five star RP and Logan does four goofy silly ones and one good one, Logan wins.
|
|
|
Post by Jack of Blades on Apr 6, 2006 17:33:57 GMT -5
Well that has more to do with Seth than RP count.
|
|
|
Post by Torture on Apr 6, 2006 17:36:50 GMT -5
It has nothing to do with RP Count, it has everything to do with RPs. It shows Dedication, and heart. If you WANT to RP, and you RP a lot.. then it shows you WANT to win the title. But if you RP 25 times and I RP 3 times. 3 Times is a lot of RPs.. but not compared to 25 fuckin' RPs. So of course you're going to win.. but not because of heart or dedication but because you have nothing else to do in life.
There has to be a max. number. Surely.
|
|
|
Post by Corey Black on Apr 6, 2006 17:39:39 GMT -5
That too.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2006 17:44:38 GMT -5
It's not a bad idea.
|
|
|
Post by Jack of Blades on Apr 6, 2006 17:56:18 GMT -5
It has nothing to do with RP Count, it has everything to do with RPs. It shows Dedication, and heart. If you WANT to RP, and you RP a lot.. then it shows you WANT to win the title. But if you RP 25 times and I RP 3 times. 3 Times is a lot of RPs.. but not compared to 25 fuckin' RPs. So of course you're going to win.. but not because of heart or dedication but because you have nothing else to do in life. There has to be a max. number. Surely. Persistance is a predicate of heart and dedication. Anyway, my point is that I agree with the idea of having boundaries for matches. However, surely independant character creation cannot be bound by other people. I may want to add a different perspective to Jack of Blades that has no relevance to any feud or anybody but the character. However, I would be unable to do this because you only want to RP twice in a week.
|
|
|
Post by Torture on Apr 6, 2006 18:05:53 GMT -5
No there has to be more than two RPs. It has to be like four or five as the max number. If there wasn't a maxed number, RJ wouldn't be Champion.
|
|
|
Post by Jack of Blades on Apr 6, 2006 18:06:35 GMT -5
I was generalising.
|
|
|
Post by Corey Black on Apr 6, 2006 18:07:14 GMT -5
See, I understand where you're coming from. There are 50 angles this can take.
Alright. One could suggest that you could just change styles and it would be as effective as doing an entire RP or series on it. But, I do realize that's no fun.
So. Fuck I don't know. Character development is better suited on the Slam and PPV shows, anyhow. Leaving the window open to do it in RPs is a must, though.
If Seth whole-heartedly agrees upon looking at development as strictly development and not as competition, then I don't see a problem with seventy development RPs.
We must come to a conclusion. Or Seth can just tell us to fuck off. Never know.
|
|
|
Post by Jack of Blades on Apr 6, 2006 18:10:11 GMT -5
I have no problem with RPing only once a match/four times a week per character per feud. But, I believe independant character study should not be held back by such boundaries.
|
|
|
Post by Corey Black on Apr 6, 2006 18:14:05 GMT -5
Maybe Seth should make another section of boards, so that all development RPs can go into that, and the actual RP board will be used for competition with a structured limit.
At the beginning of RPs, you could link to the development RP that you need to read beforehand, to get a grip on what is happening.
|
|
|
Post by Jack of Blades on Apr 6, 2006 18:16:01 GMT -5
Yeah, I do like that idea.
|
|
|
Post by Corey Black on Apr 6, 2006 18:17:06 GMT -5
Hooray.
I knew there was a solution somewhere.
|
|