|
Post by Dionysus on Feb 7, 2017 10:41:08 GMT -5
Guys, keep the discussion civil.
|
|
|
Post by erikblack on Feb 7, 2017 11:05:34 GMT -5
Guys, keep the discussion civil. Trying, hoss. Hard to do when someone is being a dickhole for whatever reason.
|
|
|
Post by erikblack on Feb 7, 2017 11:06:21 GMT -5
Liar. Based on what rankings? That's based on yards and Touchdowns. Taylor Gabriel started 3 games, and played in 13. Julio Jones played in 14 games. Sanu played in 15 games. How we're they the best WR core in football and why would the league vote them as the best when there is at least one team who has more yards, catches and touchdowns than them? And the Falcons WR's didnt even play a full season. Liar. Little man syndrome is strong in this one. I mean..honestly..theres no ther reason for these attacks other than that.
|
|
|
Post by Dionysus on Feb 7, 2017 11:26:06 GMT -5
Guys, keep the discussion civil. Trying, hoss. Hard to do when someone is being a dickhole for whatever reason. Probably because you keep throwing out "small man syndrome" like you have the last two pages, but hey. Just keep it civil, alright? Both of you.
|
|
|
Post by Torture on Feb 7, 2017 11:26:43 GMT -5
Where is your article?
Based on what rankings?
I told you to stop calling names.
Quit mis-remembering stuff.
Lol
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2017 12:03:27 GMT -5
Guys, keep the discussion civil. Trying, hoss. Hard to do when someone is being a dickhole for whatever reason. Not trying to take sides here, but producing the article you've referenced stats/facts from for almost the entirety of the discussion would help tremendously. An article from NFL.com ("the league") would make your argument solid.
|
|
|
Post by Odin Balfore on Feb 7, 2017 12:42:42 GMT -5
It's as if Tom Brady didn't lead his team to the best comeback in football history.
And you can't teach that
Badda boom. Realist goat in da room
|
|
|
Post by erikblack on Feb 7, 2017 12:56:00 GMT -5
Where is your article? Based on what rankings? I told you to stop calling names. Quit mis-remembering stuff. Lol I haven't called you anything though...
|
|
|
Post by Dionysus on Feb 7, 2017 12:57:54 GMT -5
Where is your article? Based on what rankings? I told you to stop calling names. Quit mis-remembering stuff. Lol I haven't called you anything though... "Small man syndrome"
|
|
|
Post by Crazy J zt on Feb 7, 2017 13:29:11 GMT -5
I think some of you need to agree to disagree on this topic.
and go patriots Brady is the the.... five time.... five time.... five time.... five time.... five time.... Super Bowl champion.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2017 15:11:21 GMT -5
I just assumed this is how all football discussions go ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2017 15:18:44 GMT -5
It is, especially when you're actually debating the teams itself and it can get nasty when you're debating rivals.
|
|
|
Post by "Invincible" Damian Kaine on Feb 7, 2017 17:53:20 GMT -5
which one? or do you want both? either or
|
|
|
Post by Torture on Feb 7, 2017 21:00:23 GMT -5
"They had the best WR core this season."
"His WR core? Rated the best in football this season. Those are called facts."
"Those ATLs WR core were rated best in the league."
"They were rated best in the league."
"WRs rated best core in league. Scored the most points this season."
"Fact. The Falcons WR Core was rated best in the league. Fact. You can't deny facts."
"Also..the league rated them the best WR core in football."
"I'll look for the article."
This is all I'm debating. For those who say agree to disagree, is just flat out trying to derail the thread. This is between Black and myself. And we're being civil lol.
You said theyre rated the best. Until you show an article that states the LEAGUE declared them the best, then I'll just assume you made it up and you lied. I'm also assuming you lied since you have replied numerous times without once showing the article in question.
The league doesn't even award best WR core, so that doesn't even make sense anyway.
They also didn't score the most points, I showed you the Saints stats in which their 3 WR's scored more touchdowns and had more yards.
Atlanta might be the best offense, but that takes into account tight ends, and the running game and that is NOT what we are debating.
You may try and snake your way out of other debates or conversations and sweep stuff under the rug, but that doesn't work with me. Stay focused and look at what we're debating here. Statistically speaking, the Falcons did NOT have the best WR core. Even conversationally they didn't because the talk of the town was that the Cowboys we're better in almost every part of the game and didn't get the chance to meet the Falcons.
As for everyone else; ya'll need to learn to stop derailing threads and keeping butting in with additional comments. I don't care that HE's name calling, if I needed a mod, I would PM a mod.. isn't that what we're supposed to do now?
Source: nfl.com, profootballreference.com, espnnews.com, cbssports.com, sports.yahoo.com.
As for the other comment of Brady being a 5x, 5x 5x, 5x, 5x Super Bowl Champion... I really want to see him do a spinaroonie now LOL
|
|
|
Post by kiraizumi on Feb 7, 2017 21:25:34 GMT -5
|
|